Clinico-pathological study of esophageal mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a 10-year survival from a single center.

BACKGROUND: Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Esophagus (MECE) is a relatively rare tumor type, with most of the current data derived from case reports or small sample studies. This retrospective study reports on the 10-year survival data and detailed clinicopathological characteristics of 48 patients with esophageal MEC. METHODS: Data were collected from 48 patients who underwent curative surgery for esophageal MEC at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. These were compared with contemporaneous cases of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC). Using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis, we investigated the clinicopathological factors affecting the survival of patients with MEC. RESULTS: The incidence of MECE was predominantly higher in males, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 7:1. The mid-thoracic segment emerged as the most common site of occurrence. A mere 6.3% of cases were correctly diagnosed preoperatively. The lymph node metastasis rate stood at 35.4%. The overall 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates for all patients were 85.4%, 52.1%, 37.0%, and 31.0%, respectively. Post 1:1 propensity score matching, no significant statistical difference was observed in the Overall Survival (OS) between MEC patients and those with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC) (P = 0.119, P = 0.669). Univariate analysis indicated that T staging and N staging were the primary factors influencing the prognosis of esophageal MEC. CONCLUSIONS: MECE occurs more frequently in males than females, with the mid-thoracic segment being the most common site of occurrence. The rate of accurate preoperative endoscopic diagnosis is low. The characteristic of having a short lesion length yet exhibiting significant extramural invasion may be a crucial clinicopathological feature of MECE. The OS of patients with MEC does not appear to significantly differ from those with esophageal squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Number of positive lymph nodes affects oncologic outcomes in cN0 mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary gland.

The survival significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in salivary gland carcinoma remains unclear. Thus, the current study aimed to determine the effect of the number of positive lymph nodes on disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in cN0 mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the major salivary gland. Patients surgically treated for MEC of the major salivary gland between 1975 and 2019 were retrospectively enrolled from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. The total population was randomly divided into training and test groups (1:1). Primary outcome variables were DSS and OS. Prognostic models were constructed based on the independent prognostic factors determined using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses in the training group and were validated in the test group using C-index. A total of 3317 patients (1624 men and 1693 women) with a mean age of 55 ± 20 years were included. The number of positive lymph nodes was an independent prognostic factor for both DSS and OS, but the effect began when at least two positive lymph nodes for DSS and three positive lymph nodes for OS were found. Predictive models for DSS and OS in the training group had C-indexes of 0.873 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.853-0.893) and 0.835 (95% CI 0.817-0.853), respectively. The validation of the test group showed C-indexes of 0.877 (95% CI 0.851-0.902) for DSS and 0.820 (95% CI 0.798-0.842) for OS. The number of positive lymph nodes was statistically associated with survival in cN0 major salivary gland MEC. The current prognostic model could provide individualized follow-up strategies for patients with high reliability.

Machine learning-based survival prediction nomogram for postoperative parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma (P-MEC) is a significant histopathological subtype of salivary gland cancer with inherent heterogeneity and complexity. Existing clinical models inadequately offer personalized treatment options for patients. In response, we assessed the efficacy of four machine learning algorithms vis-à-vis traditional analysis in forecasting the overall survival (OS) of P-MEC patients. Using the SEER database, we analyzed data from 882 postoperative P-MEC patients (stages I-IVA). Single-factor Cox regression and four machine learning techniques (random forest, LASSO, XGBoost, best subset regression) were employed for variable selection. The optimal model was derived via stepwise backward regression, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Bootstrap resampling facilitated internal validation, while prediction accuracy was gauged through C-index, time-dependent ROC curve, and calibration curve. The model's clinical relevance was ascertained using decision curve analysis (DCA). The study found 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates of 0.887, 0.841, and 0.753, respectively. XGBoost, BSR, and LASSO stood out in predictive efficacy, identifying seven key prognostic factors including age, pathological grade, T stage, N stage, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and marital status. A subsequent nomogram revealed a C-index of 0.8499 (3-year), 0.8557 (5-year), and 0.8375 (10-year) and AUC values of 0.8670, 0.8879, and 0.8767, respectively. The model also highlighted the clinical significance of postoperative radiotherapy across varying risk levels. Our prognostic model, grounded in machine learning, surpasses traditional models in prediction and offer superior visualization of variable importance.

Molecular Aspects of Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma and Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland.

BACKGROUND: Salivary gland tumors (SGTs) are rare and highly heterogeneous lesions, making diagnosis a challenging activity. In addition, the small number of studies and samples evaluated difficults the determination of prognosis and diagnosis. Despite the solid advances achieved by research, there is still an intense need to investigate biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and that explain the evolution and progression of SGTs. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review of the molecular alterations focusing on the most frequent malignant SGTs: mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma. RESULTS: Due to the importance of biomarkers in the tumorigenenic process, this review aimed to address the mechanisms involved and to describe molecular and biomarker pathways to better understand some aspects of the pathophysiology of salivary gland tumorigenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular analysis is essential not only to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of the tumors but also to identify novel driver pathways in the precision medicine scenario.

SALTT study: A retrospective analysis of 111 SAlivary gland tumors of Lung and Tracheobronchial Tree.

INTRODUCTION: Primary pulmonary salivary gland-type tumours (PPSGT) are rare lung neoplasms arising from submucosal seromucinous glands in the central airway. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of 111 PPSGTs diagnosed at our institute between 2003 and 2021. The mean age at diagnosis was 43.8 years(range 6-78 years) and a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. On imaging, 92 % of cases had centrally located tumours and 37.3 % were early stage. The histopathological types included 70 cases (63 %) of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), 31 cases (27.7 %) of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ADCC), two cases of myoepithelial carcinoma, one case each of acinic cell carcinoma (ACC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) and 5 others [including adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland origin(n = 3), carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation(n = 1) and poorly differentiated carcinoma of salivary gland type(n = 1)]. The size of the tumours found in the resection specimens ranged from 1 cm to 13 cm, with an average size of 4.9 cm. High-risk attributes such as lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), pleural involvement, positive resection margins, and nodal metastasis were identified in 15.3 %, 15.3 %, 13.6 %,15.2 % and 6.7 % of cases, respectively. These attributes were found to be more frequent in ADCC than in MEC. Surgery was the main treatment modality [68/84 (80 %) cases]. ADCC cases had more recurrence and distant metastasis than MEC cases. The 3- year overall-survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival(RFS) were better in patients with age lesser than 60 years(p-value <0.0001), low pT stage (p-value 0.00038) and lower grade of MEC(p-value-0.0067). CONCLUSION: It is crucial to have an acquaintance with the morphologic spectrum and immunophenotypic characteristics of PPSGT to recognize them in this unusual location. In tandem, it is crucial to differentiate them from conventional primary non-small cell lung carcinoma, as the management protocols and prognostic implications differ significantly.

TGFß signaling pathway in salivary gland tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Pleomorphic adenoma (PA), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) are the most prevalent salivary gland tumors. Their pathogenesis has been recently associated with complex molecular cascades, including the TGFß signaling pathway. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of genes associated with the TGFß signaling pathway (TGFB1, ITGB6, SMAD2, SMAD4, FBN1, LTBP1, and c-MYC) to map possible downstream alterations in the TGFß cascade. DESIGN: Thirteen PA, 17 MEC, 13 ACC, and 10 non-neoplastic salivary gland samples were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: Cases of PA presented increased TGFB1, LTPB1, c-MYC, and FBN1 expressions, whereas SMAD2 expression was decreased when compared to non-neoplastic tissue. MEC patients displayed increased expressions of TGFB1, ITGB6, FBN1, and c-MYC and decreased expressions of SMAD2 and SMAD4. ACC cases exhibited elevated expressions of the investigated genes except TGFB1. The present results suggest that decreased expression of SMAD2 and SMAD4 does not impede the transcriptional regulation of c-MYC, especially in PA and MEC. Increased expressions of ITGB6, TGFB1, LTBP1, and FBN1 appear to be related to the regulation of the TGFß signaling pathway in these tumors. Additionally, we observed a higher expression of SMAD4 in ACC and a raised expression of ITGB6 and lowered expression of SMAD2 in MEC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated the differential expression of TGFß cascade members in salivary gland tumors such as SMAD2/SMAD4 and c-MYC as well as the participation of ITGB6, TGFB1, LTBP1, and FBN1, contributing to the understanding of the mechanisms involved in tumor progression.

Glandular odontogenic cyst: Review of literature and report of two cases.

Glandular odontogenic cyst (GOC) is a rare developmental odontogenic cyst from the cell rests of Serres. GOC is locally aggressive with a tendency toward recurrence. The most common site of occurrence is the anterior mandible with an asymptomatic presentation. Radiographically, it presents as unilocular or multilocular radiolucency. It bears histopathological resemblance to low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma. We report two cases of GOC occurring in a 16-year-old and a 33-year-old male patient with a review of the clinical presentation, histopathological features, and diagnostic aspects of GOC reported so far in literature.

Assessment of MUC5AC and MUC2 Immunoexpression in Glandular Odontogenic Cysts, Dentigerous Cysts, and Mucoepidermoid Carcinomas.

Glandular odontogenic cysts (GOCs) and dentigerous cysts may show mucous metaplasia. Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma is very rare and mostly associated with dental cysts. It is hypothesized that odontogenic cysts showing mucus differentiation in their lining, have a propensity to transform into MEC. The present study is the first attempt to explore the relationship between odontogenic cysts [GOCs and dentigerous cysts with mucus metaplasia (DCMM)] and MEC by evaluating immunoexpression of MUC5AC and MUC2. Immunoexpression of MUC5AC and MUC2 was evaluated semiquantitatively in GOCs (20 cases), DCMMs (20 cases), and MECs (20 cases). The percentage of positive cells, intensity, and localization of immunoexpression were assessed for each marker in all cases. Of GOCs, DCMMs, and MECs cases, 85%, 70%, and 80%, respectively, were immunopositive for MUC5AC. Strong cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for MUC5AC was noted, particularly in mucous cells present diffusely within MECs. However, the immunoreactivity was limited to the epithelial lining of GOCs and DCMMs. Most of the MECs (60%) showed more than 25% positivity for MUC5AC, followed by GOCs, and the least in DMMCs. Mild cytoplasmic and nuclear positivity of MUC2 was noted only in epithelial lining cells of 70% GOCs and 45% DCMMs. Whereas, 55% of MECs displayed moderate to strong cytoplasmic and membranous immunopositivity for MUC2 exclusively within mucous cells. As MECs showed strong MUC5AC immunoreactivity in mucous cells, immunoexpression of MUC5AC in odontogenic cysts with mucus cells can possibly explain the pathogenesis of MEC from cysts. However, the variable expression of MUC2 did not give any strong evidence regarding its role as a marker.

Re-evaluating a historic cohort of sinonasal and skull base mucoepidermoid carcinoma: an institutional experience.

AIMS: Primary mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MECs) of the sinonasal tract and nasopharynx are rare entities that represent a diagnostic challenge, especially in biopsy samples. Herein, we present a case series of MECs of the sinonasal and skull base and its mimics to evaluate the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics in order to avoid misdiagnosis. METHODS: We reviewed the pathology records of patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2022. Thirty MECs were consecutively diagnosed during that period. RESULTS: Based on morphological and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses, 30 tumors originally diagnosed as MECs were separated into MAML2 fusion-positive (7 cases) and MAML2 fusion-negative groups (23 cases), in which 14 tumors were positive for the EWSR1::ATF1 fusion; these tumors were reclassified to have hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma (HCCC). The remaining nine MAML2 FISH negative cases were reconfirmed as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, 3 cases) which showed keratinization and high Ki-67 expression; DEK::AFF2 carcinomas (2 cases), in which DEK gene rearrangement was detected by FISH; and MECs as previously described (4 cases) with typical morphological features. Including 7 MAML2 rearrangements tumors, 11 MEC cases had a male-to-female ratio of 4.5:1, and 6 tumors arose from the nasopharyngeal region, while 5 tumors arose from the sinonasal region. The prognosis of this series of salivary gland-type MECs was favorable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that HCCC runs the risk of being misdiagnosed as MEC in the sinonasal tract and nasopharynx, particularly with biopsy specimens. Careful histological evaluation with supporting molecular testing can facilitate pathological diagnoses.

Histologic grading of salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A comparison of four grading systems and correlation with survival.

BACKGROUND: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant lesion of salivary glands. A number of histologic grading systems are in use for MEC with variable agreement between them. METHODS: This study was aimed at comparison of four grading systems for MEC: two qualitative (modified Healy and MSKCC grading) and two quantitative (AFIP and Brandwein grading). A retrospective search for diagnosed cases of MEC over eight years yielded 11 cases with adequate clinical details and histologic slides available for review. All cases were reviewed and graded as per the four grading systems. An inter-system agreement was assessed, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to correlate the grading with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A general agreement between all four grading systems was seen in 72.7% of cases. Brandwein grading assigned the highest percentage of high grades (18.2%), whereas Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) assigned the highest percentage of low-grade MEC (72.7%). The agreement between MSKCC and modified Healy was highest at 90% of cases. There was generally a poor agreement between MSKCC and Brandwein grading systems. The MSKCC grading system showed a significant correlation with disease-free survival in MEC patients. CONCLUSION: Hence, the MSKCC grading system might serve as a better histologic grading system with a predictive value for the biologic behavior of the tumor. Further larger studies are required to validate these findings and implement the uniform use of MSKCC grading for MEC of salivary glands.

Pulmonary Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma Mimicking Carcinoid Lung on 18 F-FDG and 68 Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT.

ABSTRACT: Pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (PMEC) is a rare pulmonary neoplasm. Although 18 F-FDG PET/CT has been shown to present with increased metabolic activity in PMEC, literature does not report increased somatostatin receptor expression in these tumors. We present the case of a 15-year-old boy where PMEC mimicked a typical carcinoid of the lung on DOTANOC PET/CT by showing significant uptake on 68 Ga-DOTANOC.

A high-grade breast mucoepidermoid carcinoma without MAML2 rearrangement: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the breast is an extremely rare primary breast tumor. Between 1979 and June 2022, only 50 cases were reported. The pathological morphology and biological behavior of breast MEC remain poorly understood. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 47-year-old female was presented with a 10-day-old left breast mass detected by physical examination. DIAGNOSES: Ultrasonography could not distinguish whether the breast tumor was benign or malignant. After a biopsy of a breast tumor excision specimen, combined with immunohistochemical results, the patient was diagnosed with high-grade mucoepidermoid breast carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent a modified radical mastectomy for her left breast. OUTCOMES: The patient was still free from local recurrence or metastases at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: A high-grade MEC case without MAML2 rearrangement shows good recovery without complications. The diagnosis was confirmed by histomorphology and immunohistochemical markers. It is sometimes necessary to distinguish it from adenosquamous, adenoid cystic, or mucinous carcinoma. The primary treatment is surgical resection, and the prognosis is closely related to the pathological grade.

E-CADERIN, N-CADERIN, SLUG, SNAIL, and TWIST contribute to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in salivary gland tumors.

BACKGROUND: Transcription factors are important in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process and are possibly related to the development of a more invasive tumor phenotype. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the expression and identify the localization of cellular markers related to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process in salivary gland tumors. STUDY DESIGN: The expression and localization of E-CADERIN, N-CADERIN, SLUG, SNAIL, and TWIST were evaluated, using immunohistochemistry, in 48 salivary gland tumors, being 17 pleomorphic adenomas (PA), 14 adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC), and 17 mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC). these proteins were compared to clinical and histopathologic parameters. normal gland tissues were included for immunohistochemical comparisons. RESULTS: ACC and MEC cases showed higher expression of SNAIL compared to PA. MEC showed high expression of SLUG and TWIST. Low expression of N-CADHERIN, SNAIL, and TWIST in ACC was frequent in T3 and T4. High expression of TWIST in MEC was more frequent at age ≥ 40 years A positive correlation was only observed between N-cadherin/SNAIL in ACC, between SNAIL/TWIST in MEC, and between SLUG/TWIST in PA. CONCLUSION: This study provided insight into EMT-related proteins (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, SNAIL, SLUG, and TWIST) and their contribution to the maintenance of morphogenesis and the development of the salivary gland tumors and showed a positive correlation among N-CADHERIN/SNAIL in ACC and SNAIL/TWIST in MEC.

Genomics and tumor microenvironment of breast mucoepidermoid carcinoma based on whole-exome and RNA sequencing.

Mammary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare entity. The molecular characteristics of breast MEC have not been fully investigated due to its rarity. We performed a retrospective study among 1000 patients with breast carcinomas and identified four cases of breast MEC. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Immunohistochemistry panels which were used to diagnose salivary gland MEC and breast carcinomas were also performed. MAML2 rearrangements were detected by FISH and fusion partners were identified by RNA sequencing. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was used to reveal the genomes of these four breast MEC. Then, the biological functions and features of breast MEC were further compared with those of invasive breast carcinomas and salivary gland MEC.According to Ellis and Auclair's methods, these four breast MEC could be classified as low-grade breast MEC. All the patients were alive, and disease-free survival (PFS) ranged from 20 months to 67 months. Among these four breast MEC, two cases were triple-negative, and the other two cases were found to be ER positive, with one also showing HER2 equivocal by immunohistochemical staining, but no amplification in FISH. FISH analysis confirmed the presence of the MAML2 translocation in three of four tumors, and CRTC1-MAML2 fusion was confirmed in two of them by RNA-sequencing. The average coverage size of WES for the tumor mutation burden estimation was 32 Mb. MUC4, RP1L1 and QRICH2 mutations were identified in at least three tumors, and these mutation also existed in breast invasive carcinoma databases (TCGA, Cell 2015; TCGA, Nature 2012). The results showed that there were many genes in breast MEC overlapping with the breast invasive carcinoma databases mentioned above, range from 5 to 63 genes (median:21 genes). Next, we assessed immune cell infiltration levels in these tumors. In all these tumors, M2 macrophages and plasma cell were in the high infiltration group. Our breast MEC showed different results from the salivary gland MEC, whose plasma cells were in the low infiltration group. Overall, we first analyzed the genomics and tumor microenvironment of breast mucoepidermoid carcinoma and proposed our hypothesis that although MECs arising in the breast resemble their salivary gland counterparts phenotypically, our findings indicate that breast MECs probably resemble invasive breast carcinomas at the genetic level and immune cell infiltration levels. More cases and in deep research need to be done to further understand this rare carcinoma.

Primary intranodal Warthin-like variant of mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

This report describes a rare case of primary intranodal Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma (WL-MEC) presenting as a left level II lymph node mass in a 48-year-old man. Warthin-like mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a recently defined variant of MEC that bears a close histologic resemblance to Warthin tumor. Whereas MEC has readily identifiable key histologic features that render diagnosis relatively straightforward, WL-MEC is a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping histologic features and only limited case reports in the literature. This case was initially diagnosed as primary intranodal MEC after the exclusion of metastasis by imaging. It was not until years later, upon review of historic cases, that the diagnosis of WL-MEC was established. This diagnosis was further supported by molecular testing that was not available at the time of the original diagnosis.

Elective nodal dissection for cN0 intermediate-grade parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A NCDB study.

PURPOSE: To determine the occult nodal disease rate and whether elective regional lymph node dissection (RLND) confers any 10-year overall survival (OS) in cN0 intermediate-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the parotid gland. MATERIALS & METHODS: The National Cancer Database was reviewed from 2004 to 2016 on adults with cT1-4aN0M0 intermediate-grade parotid MEC undergoing resection with/without RLND. Comparisons between patients with and without RLND were made. Occult nodal rate and 10-year overall survival (OS) were determined. RESULTS: Out of 898 included patients with cN0 intermediate grade parotid MEC undergoing elective RLND, the occult nodal rate was 7.6%. This was significantly different from low-grade (3.9%) and high-grade (25.7%) cN0 disease. When stratified by pT-classification, marginal differences were identified between low-grade and intermediate-grade tumors, whereas high-grade tumors demonstrated increased occult nodal disease with low T-stage (pT1-pT2, 20.4% vs. 5.1%) and high T-stage (pT3-pT4a, 32.1% vs. 17.6%). Patients undergoing elective RLND were more often treated at an academic facility (53.8% vs. 41.2%), had higher pT3-pT4 tumors (19.2% vs. 10.4%), and more frequently underwent total/radical parotidectomy (46.0% vs. 29.9%) with adjuvant radiation therapy (53.8% vs. 41.0%) Cox-proportional hazard modeling did not identify RLND, regardless if stratified by nodal yield or pT-classification, nor nodal positivity as significant predictors of 10-year OS. CONCLUSIONS: The occult nodal disease in intermediate-grade parotid MEC is low and similar to low-grade. Elective RLND may have a limited impact on OS, though its effect on locoregional control remains unknown. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the pancreas: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a common malignant neoplasm of the salivary glands, but is very rare in the pancreas. To date, only 10 cases have been reported in the literature. Because MEC of the pancreas is very rare, there is little information about its diagnosis, treatment, and metastasis. Herein, we present the eleventh case and review the relevant literature. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old woman presented with a mass in the body of the pancreas and multiple masses in the liver on abdominal magnetic resonance imaging. The patient initially underwent EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. After adjuvant chemotherapy, resection of the pancreatic body and tail was performed, and the tissues were pathologically, histologically, and immunochemically examined. Specific strains and gene rearrangements were analyzed. DIAGNOSIS: Mucoepidermoid pancreatic cancer. INTERVENTION: After a 4-month course of adjuvant chemotherapy, laparoscopic surgery was performed. OUTCOMES: The patient is alive until the submission of this paper. CONCLUSION: We presented a case of mucoepidermoid pancreatic cancer in a 65-year-old woman. Pathological examination revealed that the tumor parenchyma consisted of 3 cell types. There are mainly epidermoid cells, intermediate cells between the basal and epidermoid cells, and mucus-producing cells in varying proportions. Immunohistochemical staining showed that there were different types of cells with unique morphological characteristics. In summary, primary MECs of the pancreas are rare and have poor prognosis. Few studies have been conducted on the diagnosis, treatment, and metastasis of MECs; therefore, further studies are needed to detect them.

Pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a 7-year-old child.

A 7-year-old boy presented with exertional dyspnea and cough, initially misdiagnosed as asthma. Imaging revealed a mass obstructing the left main bronchus, later identified as a pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC). Following surgical sleeve resection, complete tumor removal occurred without malignancy in surrounding lymph nodes, resulting in symptom resolution without additional therapy. Pulmonary MEC, uncommon in pediatric patients, poses diagnostic challenges due to nonspecific symptoms, resulting in delayed diagnosis. Typically managed via complete surgical resection, MEC offers a favorable prognosis, primarily affecting central airways and requiring conservative surgical approaches to preserve lung tissue. This case underscores the diagnostic challenges of primary pulmonary MEC in pediatric patients. It stresses the need to consider unusual causes in pediatric respiratory symptoms and highlights the critical role of precise diagnostic methods and personalized surgical strategies in managing such rare pulmonary malignancies for optimal outcomes.

Heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression in MAML2-rearranged mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a malignant tumor with diverse morphologies, some of which have poor prognostic indicators and others that challenge the grading system. This study investigated the expression of PD-L1 in different grades and phenotypes of MEC. METHODS: The present study was carried out on twenty-four archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks of salivary MEC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to detect MAML2 rearrangement in MEC cases to be included. The studied cases were then subcategorized based on their grading and phenotype and immunohistochemically stained for PD-L1. RESULTS: PD-L1 expression in MEC varied, with some variants showing moderate to strong immunoexpression, while others did not express it at all. In the Warthin-like MEC, some tumors show high expression of PD-L1, while in the same pattern, a few cases showed low or no expression. Intraosseous MEC exhibited moderate PD-L1 expression. Sclerosing MEC featured lower PD-L1 expression, from weak to moderate. Oncocytic MEC displayed relatively low PD-L1 expression levels (weak to moderate). CONCLUSION: The histomorphologic features of MEC may predict clinicopathologic behavior, and subtyping MEC may pose a significant therapeutic value, particularly for intraosseous MECs and clear-cell MECs. PD-L1 expression is a good predictor of survival outcomes in MECs.